Skip to content

Independent guidance

Powered byYouSail.com.au
Marine Autopilot

Product comparison

Raymarine EV-100 Tiller vs Simrad TP32

EV-100 Tiller vs Simrad TP32: separate Evolution components versus a self-contained tillerpilot, with installation, control and ownership trade-offs.

Option 2
Simrad TP32

The principal difference here is the system layout. EV-100 Tiller combines a cockpit drive with separate Evolution components; TP32 keeps the tillerpilot in a self-contained arrangement. This comparison is specifically about the EV-100 Tiller package, not the Wheel or Power versions that share the EV-100 name.

Side by side

Raymarine EV-100 Tiller vs Simrad TP32: specifications and installation

CriterionRaymarine EV-100 TillerSimrad TP32
System layoutSeparate Evolution sensing, control and tiller driveSelf-contained cockpit tillerpilot
Survey emphasisComponent locations and cable routes as well as drive mountingTillerpilot mounting and supported connections
Retained instrumentsVerify the SeaTalkng system and required data sourcesVerify SimNet/NMEA source compatibility
Quote scopeComplete tiller pack, network and installationPilot, mounting accessories, wiring and setup

Specifications and installation scope from manufacturer documentation. Any AUD prices shown are indicative; confirm current package contents and installed costs with a dealer.

Which should you choose?

EV-100 Tiller is a useful shortlist when you want its supported system integration and can accommodate the separate components. TP32 suits consideration when a self-contained arrangement meets the boat’s requirements. Both still need a suitable cockpit drive installation.

Choose if

Which autopilot configuration suits your boat?

Choose Raymarine EV-100 Tiller if…

  • You have room for the separate components and a clear need for the supported Evolution integration.

Choose Simrad TP32 if…

  • You prefer a self-contained tillerpilot and the supplier confirms it suits the boat.

Walk through the installation in the cockpit and below

For EV-100 Tiller, identify where the sensor, control electronics and display will be fitted before accepting a package price. For TP32, consider the operating position of the unit on the tiller. In both cases, check movement around the cockpit and access to the supported release procedure.

Separate integration benefits from steering limits

Write down the features you will use, then ask how each system provides them with the instruments aboard. Do not assume that separate electronics make the tiller actuator suitable for a heavier or more demanding application. Have the drive assessed on its own requirements and confirm the complete configuration in the handover record.

Questions

Raymarine EV-100 Tiller vs Simrad TP32: frequently asked questions

Is EV-100 Tiller a below-deck drive?

No. Its system has separate components, but this package uses a tiller drive in the cockpit.

Does this comparison cover EV-100 Wheel?

No. Wheel and hydraulic Power packages require different installation assessments.

Can TP32 be controlled by any network display?

Do not assume that receiving instrument data is the same as full control from a display. Verify the exact function and supported equipment.

Manufacturer sources for this comparison

Source-based comparison checked 2 October 2026. No comparative sea trial is claimed.

Autopilot training after installation

The best pack badly understood is a worse autopilot than a modest one used well. A half-day handover covers modes, override, alarms and a failure drill.